With the word "education", i think in my chilhood, the past in the school, in all my teachers. And i don`t could avoid to compare this teachers with my professors of the university. And both are good elements and bad elements as educators and as workers of a institution.I think that i was the most happy girl in primary school education. But always says: the children stay so much time in the school. And this is a problem because quantity isn`t quality.
The Finland education system look like very good, very interesting and accomplished proyect. All childrens in Finland are really learning and this situation don`t stand out, all are equals. In my opinion, the education in my country is very selective. Only some people have a good education or a relative and expensive education (money say in Chile: "oh! this is good because is expensive"). And some childrens manage love the consciousness. Other people lear to love the consciousness when could be dedicate time to some of this taste. For the mayority, the education is an obligation or a form of get much money with more and more titles of many institutions. In my case, i was "luck" because my parents don`t have much money, but my mother find an alternative (and private) school. It wasn`t expensive. Too, i had a scholarship for my good califications. In this place i had time for search myself and my friends. But, i had bad teachers too. All the people have some or all bad teachers in the life. Because, in Chile, the teachers in the school, are very dissapointed and this emotion is transmiting to the students. In the university is differents because the teachers are researchers, but the problem is that they don`t know how explain their knowless in a simple method. And the knowless became a cultural capital and the university students live in a kind of competition.
In my opinion, the education in Chile could be better if the State spend much money in this area because the education is transverse in all the relationships. Less weapons, more schools. And less students for curse, too. And, that the public school have students of differents social class for the equality ongoing. I think that the difference between Chile and Finland are all the elements names. The fact that in Chile by choose a better education, you must pay, is an educations of market for the rich people. In Finland have a different concept about education. Chile need a change of mentality. Chile look towards EE.UU, and this country is horrible in very much meanings. But this change need be accompaine of money.
And the teachers need more time for recreation, and places for have more and actually knowless by let of speak about of boring themes imposed for the Education Ministry. Too, with this motivation and better pay of course, some aspects could be better. Too, the childrens in social risk must be place for study and a supports of a group of responsible people that want teach of all students with the difficults include.
I`m agree about teachers get paid same as a lawyers or doctors and bankers. The problem in this case is that these people have a lot of mony. The life must be more cheap with our tax and the tax of busines. The teachers are very important in this world. All the peoples should be teach, something like this: "lear to teach, teach to learn" or "learn by teach, teach by learn". By all, all, all the time.
The technology help to know more, understand other reality in other distant land, at the moment. So, the people, i include, must wake up, because the constant discovery of the human are very amazing but too, the use of the science, for example, be used for the destruction of the planet earth. And then... what?, travel to other planet? for destroy its too? Is fundamental have more conscience about: the human is only a little part of the Nature. Is necesary rescue values that don`t have economic price. In this sense, the economist have been developer of a poor and misery present.